Will the Supreme Court Kill Rent Control?, Ctd.
Over that Volokh, Ilya Somin follows up on a potentially important takings case that the Supreme Court may decide to hear:
When I first heard about this case, my reaction was that it was probably precluded by the Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Yee v. Escondido, which ruled that a California statute imposing rent control on mobile home parks was not a taking, even though state law allowed tenants to renew the rent-controlled leases indefinitely even against the will of the owners. I am no fan of the Yee decision, but the Court is unlikely to overrule it in the near future.However, there is a crucial difference between Harmon’s case and Yee. In the latter, the Court emphasized that there was no permanent physical occupation of the owners’ property because “the Mobilehome Residency Law provides that a park owner who wishes to change the use of his land may evict his tenants” so long as he then uses the property for something other than a mobile home park. By contrast, as Root describes, the New York City rent control law does not allow Harmon and other landlords to evict their tenants even if they do wish to use the property for something other than rental housing. Effectively, therefore, this is a government-imposed permanent physical occupation of property.
This is the web log for Professor Duncan's Property Class at Nebraska Law. Rugged individualism and liberty are inseparable: “There can be no liberty unless there is economic liberty.” — Margaret Thatcher "We didn't love freedom enough. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward." -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn "This is America, we don't share land here." John Dutton Yellowstone
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Possible New Takings Case
From the PropertyProf blog:
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Lane Lecture--Today at 12:10 in Auditorium
Message from Dean Poser:
Please take advantage of this great opportunity!
We are honored and lucky today to have Stanford Law Professor Pam Karlan at the Law College to present the Lane Lecture at 12:10 in the Hamann Auditorium
Professor Karlan is an eminent scholar of constitutional law and the co-director of Stanford's Supreme Court Litigation Clinic. She has at times been talked about as a possible appointee to the United States Supreme Court. Her lecture is entitled Keeping Faith with the Constitution.
I urge you to take this opportunity to hear what is sure to be an excellent and thought-provoking lecture by such an accomplished and well known speaker.
Susan Poser
Please take advantage of this great opportunity!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)